Click to chat with Brum Bot, our AI-powered virtual assistant. ×
First year with the Caribbean Deep Engagement Partner | Caribbean Deep Engagement Partner | Birmingham City Council

First year with the Caribbean Deep Engagement Partner

The Caribbean Deep Engagement Partner (DEP) have completed the first year of their 3-year programme.

Focus group 1 topic: women's health

Objectives

  • Understand interest in creating a Black women's network
  • Understand experiences with other networks and design preferences
  • Explore the added benefit of collective effort over individual action
  • Consider the governance and structure of the network
  • Create a provisional list of priorities for the network

Findings

  • Strong interest and support for a Black women's network
  • Participants had mixed experiences with previous networks, valuing empowerment and support, but frustrated by a lack of impact and direction
  • Many felt their voices were not heard in existing health and policy reports
  • Collective action was seen as more powerful and sustainable than individual efforts
  • Participants highlighted the need for a network that is inclusive, proactive, and community-driven
  • Suggested features included face-to-face and online meetings, peer support, skill sharing, and flexible membership
  • A 6-month wish list was developed, covering health inequalities, economic empowerment, representation, inclusivity, collaboration, cultural wisdom, and youth engagement

Recommendations

  • Share the focus group report with stakeholders
  • Create a digital platform for the network
  • Organise a social event to build momentum and community
  • Review and prioritise 3 to 4 key issues from the wish list
  • Identify training and development needs
  • Develop branding for the network

Focus group 2 topic: older adults and mobility

Objectives

  • Understand community awareness of the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital (ROH) and its services
  • Understand referral patterns to the ROH
  • Explore awareness of the right to request a referral to the ROH
  • Identify steps to increase engagement with ROH services

Findings

  • Half of the participants knew aboutthe ROH, but only one had used its services
  • Most participants did not know they could request a referral to the ROH
  • GP (General Practitioner, usually your family doctor) referrals were assumed to be based on existing relationships and convenience
  • Participants felt that they could not challenge GP decisions or request alternative referrals
  • Relationships with GPs varied — some said they felt dismissed, and there were delays and poor communication
  • Decision-making for treatment location was influenced by proximity, parking costs, word of mouth, past experiences, and staff attitudes
  • Some participants preferred alternative treatments, such as natural remedies, private care, and self-research
  • Participants felt the referral process was complex and inaccessible
  • There was a lack of confidence in exercising patient rights without fear of negative consequences

Recommendations

  • Investigate how GPs choose referrals and explore ways to diversify referrals to the ROH
  • Raise awareness within Black communities about their right to request referrals without fear of delay or stigma
  • Explore ways to deliver ROH services directly in communities to reduce reliance on GP referrals
  • Facilitate collaboration between the ROH and deep engagement partners from Caribbean, African, and Somali communities
  • Consider expanding engagement to reflect broader Black community experiences

Focus group 3 topic: men's health

Objectives

  • Raise awareness of the Birmingham Men's Health Needs report and the national Men's Health Strategy
  • Gather lived experience evidence to inform both local and national policy
  • Identify ways to improve support for healthier behaviours, health outcomes, and access to services for Black men

Findings

  • Black men face inconsistent quality of care, limited GP access, and a lack of culturally competent services
  • Community spaces and men's groups are necessary for emotional support and health engagement
  • Natural remedies and self-research are commonly used, but can lead to misinformation
  • Distrust in the NHS and systemic racism make it hard to use health services
  • Costs and geographic disparities limit access to healthy food, fitness, and care
  • Black men are underrepresented in NHS leadership and the workforce
  • Peer support, emotional expression, and culturally relevant services are valued but under-supported

Recommendations

  • Co-design health campaigns with community input
  • Create culturally relevant dietary and mental health resources
  • Expand GP training on cultural competency and natural remedies
  • Fund and support men's groups and community health hubs
  • Promote continuity of care and flexible GP consultation times
  • Make healthy living affordable
  • Simplify referral systems and increase direct access to services
  • Recognise and invest in community-led health solutions
  • Strengthen relationships between the NHS and Black communities
  • Encourage household conversations about health and wellbeing

Focus group 4 topic: school exclusions and reengaging young people

Objectives

  • Record the systemic nature and long-term impact of school exclusions
  • Explore risk factors that lead to exclusions among Black Caribbean young people
  • Identify ways to reduce exclusions and strengthen protective factors
  • Create options for collaborative working between schools and communities

Findings

  • Black Caribbean boys are disproportionately excluded, usually because of trauma and misunderstood behaviour
  • School responses focus on discipline rather than root causes
  • Exclusion leads to stigma, poor self-esteem, and increased risk of criminality and unemployment
  • Root causes include the absence of male role models, poor parenting support, peer pressure, and social media influence
  • Mentors with lived experience are effective, but not used enough
  • Parents and community groups face barriers to engagement and lack resources
  • Collaboration between schools and community groups improves outcomes, but is limited

Recommendations

  • Embed restorative practices and mentorship from key stage 3
  • Strengthen school-community partnerships and support for mentors
  • Provide parents with clear guidance and information on their rights
  • Create a national resource of case studies and good practices
  • Create regular forums for dialogue between schools, parents, and community stakeholders
  • Co-design interventions with young people and mentors for relevance and impact
  • Develop programmes for students on conflict management, critical thinking, and accountability
  • Create supported re-entry pathways for excluded students
  • Further research into the causes of exclusion and understanding the effectiveness of interventions
  • Train school staff in trauma-informed, culturally responsive approaches
  • Improve school staff diversity to reflect communities served

Page last updated: 10 February 2026

Feedback button